Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 24.06.2025 20:32

Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Switzerland proposes forcing UBS to add $26bn in capital - Financial Times
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Thank you.
What’s next?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
How rough can the ferry passage from Hull to Rotterdam be in the autumn ( at the end of October )?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Nintendo Switch update 20.1.1 out now, patch notes - Nintendo Everything
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What would you change in Rings of Power?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Just in the last 5 years:
Why do you have to be 18+ to go live on TikTok?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Is the Shia claim true that Imam Ali was born inside the Kaaba?